C-661 de 2000
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Ximena Ayala Lorza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Identidad de cargos
- Función disciplinaria
- Descuentos por multas impuestas por contralorías
- Imposición de multa y amonestación
- Sanciones de remoción, suspensión y terminación del contrato laboral
- Autonomía e independencia
- Funciones constitucionales
- Control fiscal
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 42/93.
Arts. 99.100 y 101 parciales 102 103 y 104 parciales.
Sanciones impuestas por las contralorias.
Estarse a lo resuelto en la c-054/97 y c-484/00.
Exequible
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 42/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. ESTESE a lo resuelto en las Sentencias C-054 de 1997 y C-484 de 2000 que declararon exequibles los artículos 99, 100, 101 y 102 de la Ley 42 de 1993.
- Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las expresiones "La negativa del nominador a dar aplicación a la sanción se reputará como causal de mala conducta" y "multas" contenidas respectivamente en los artículos 103 y 104 de la Ley 42 de 1993, por el cargo analizado en esta providencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.