JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 10, 1992Full bench

C-599 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Jaime Horta Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1746/91. Arts 7 Parcial 19 Parcial 21 Parcial 26 Y 27 Parcial. Infracciones Cambiarias. Debido Proceso. Exequibles Salvo Art 27.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1746/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 19Decreto 1746/91 «las partes acusadas»UPHELD
Art. 21Decreto 1746/91 «las partes acusadas»UPHELD
Art. 26Decreto 1746/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 27Decreto 1746/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 7Decreto 1746/91 «las partes acusadas»UPHELD
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion, oido el concepto del senor Procurador General de la Nacion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar que las partes acusadas de los articulos 7o., 19 y 21 del Decreto 1746 de 1991 son exequibles.
  4. Segundo. Declarar que el articulo 26 del Decreto 1746 de 1991 es inexequible.
  5. Tercero. Declarar que el articulo 27 del Decreto 1746 de 1991, en cuanto modificado por el Decreto 2248 de 1991, es inexequible.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroDissentEduardo Cifuentes MuñozDissentCiro Angarita Baron
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.