Constitutional review ruling (C)December 7, 1992Full bench

C-592 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

✓Claimant Pedro Cañon Y Otros

✓

Topic · hard data

Dec. 2651/91. Arts 9 Al 22; 32 Y 41.Descongestion De Despachos Judiciales. Unidad Normativa.

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · source: case-law reporter's topic index

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2651/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 10Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 11Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 12Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 13Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 14Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 15Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 16Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 17Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 18Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 19Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 20Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 21Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 22Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 32Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 4Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 41Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 51Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

Art. 9Decreto 2651/91UPHELD

18 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion, y oido el concepto del senor Procurador General de la Nacion,
R E S U E L V E :
DECLARAR EXEQUIBLES los articulos 9deg, 10deg, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 32 y 41 del Decreto No. 2651 de 1991 "Por el cual se expiden normas transitorias para descongestionar los despachos judiciales."

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

Magistrado

✓

Simon Rodriguez Rodriguez

Presidente

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites0

It cites no recorded decisions.

Cited by69

C-176/23Prueba De La Costumbre Mercantil Con Decisiones Judiciales Definitivas Que Aseveren Su Existencia, Proferidas Dentro De Los 5 Años Anteriores Al Diferendo.T-364/20Debido Proceso, Acceso A Una Administracion De Justicia Pronta Y Eficaz Y Deber De Las Autoridades Judiciales De Adoptar Decisiones Ajustadas A Los Principios De Proporcionalidad Y Razonabilidad En Imposicion De Multas T-387/19Supersociedades No Vulneró El Derecho Fundamental Al Debido Proceso De Los Actores Al Calificar Sus Derechos Concursales Como Postergados Por Extemporáneos De Primera Clase.C-073/18Reforma Rural Integral. Implementación Del Acuerdo Final De Paz En Materia De Tierras.T-590/17Enfoque De Genero En Las Decisiones Judiciales.T-615/16Accion De Tutela Contra Providencia Judicial. Improcedencia Por Cuanto No Hay Desconocimiento De Precedente Para Establecer El Ibl.

See all 69 →

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.