JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 15, 1998Full bench

C-353 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Fernando Santacruz Caicedo

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1677/97. Arts. 135 Y 9. Fusion Del Instituto Electronico De Idiomas. Supresion De Empleos. Regimen Academico. Sentencia Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Fallo inhibitorio por ineptitud sustantiva
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1677/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1677/97DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 3Decreto 1677/97DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 5Decreto 1677/97DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 9Decreto 1677/97DECLINED TO RULE
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion.
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA, por las razones expuestas, para decidir en relacion con la demanda de inconstitucionalidad formulada contra los articulos 1, 3, 5 y 9 del decreto 1677 de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.