JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 19, 1994Full bench

C-189 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Antonio Luis Atencia

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1900/90. Varios Arts. Servicio Publico De Telecomunicaciones. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1900/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Decreto 1900/90 «inciso 2»UPHELD
Art. 20Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
Art. 39Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
Art. 40Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
Art. 48Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
Art. 50Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
Art. 52Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
Art. 65Decreto 1900/90UPHELD
8 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES las siguientes disposiciones del decreto 1900 de 1990:
  4. El artículo 2o. en el aparte del inciso segundo, que dice "en virtud de autorización o concesión, o por ministerio de la ley";
  5. Los artículos 20, 39, 48, 52 en sus numerales 1 y 2, y 65;
  6. El artículo 40, en la parte que dice: "Servicios de difusión. Podrán otorgarse mediante contratación directa, con la salvedad indicada en el artículo siguiente".
  7. La expresión "clandestino" consagrada en el inciso
  8. primero. del artículo 50;
  9. Estése a lo resuelto en la sentencia No. 61 del 25 de abril de 1991, proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en la que se declaró exequible el artículo 40 del decreto 1900 de 1990, por no exceder las facultades extraordinarias contenidas en el artículo 14 de la ley 72 de 1989 .
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.