JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 19, 2004Full bench

C-130 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Mauricio Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Administradora Del Regimen Subsidiado En Plan Nacional De Desarrollo. Nuevas Entidades Públicas O Privadas Serán Sin Ánimo De Lucro
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Administradora Del Regimen Subsidiado
  • Impedir que se constituya con ánimo de lucro es una medida razonable del legislador
  • Animo de lucro resulta inconstitucional
  • Requisito de ser entidad sin ánimo de lucro no desconoce libertades constitucionales económicas
  • Modificación de situación jurídica
Administradora Del Regimen Subsidiado En Plan Nacional De Desarrollo
  • Nuevas entidades públicas o privadas serán sin ánimo de lucro
Libertad Economica
  • Limitación razonable
  • Jurisprudencia constitucional
  • Restricción
Control De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia sobre nuevo cargo planteado por el Procurador General
Seguridad Social
  • Prestación por entidades privadas sin limitación alguna
Servicio Publico De Salud
  • Participación de particulares
Plan Nacional De Desarrollo
  • No idoneidad para modificar todas las leyes en todos los ramos de la legislación
10 topics · 16 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 812 de 2003.

Art. 127.

Plan nacional de desarrollo 2003-2006.

Ajustes al regimen subsidiado.

Creación ars como entidades publicas y/0 privadas sin animo de lucro.

Libertad economica de empresa y competencia.

Libertad de configuración legislativa.

Exequible

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 812/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 127Ley 812/03UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE, por los cargos analizados, el articulo 127 de la Ley 812 de 2003.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
ConcurrenceAlfredo Beltrán SierraConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur GalvisConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.