JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 24, 2000Full bench

C-1109 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Juan Manuel Dumez Arias

✓
Topic · hard data
Codigo Civil. Art.552 Inc.2. Curaduria Del Demente. No Se Encomendara A Persona Llamada A Heredarle A No Ser Su Padre Madre O Su Conyuge Que Comprende Al Compañero Permanente. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cuidado Personal De Demente
  • Corresponde a padres, cónyuge o compañero permanente
  • Distinción entre personas con vocación a sucederlo no vulnera principio de igualdad
Cuidado Personal De Incapaz
  • Deber de padres, cónyuge o compañero permanente
Principio De La Buena Fe
  • No se desconoce por disposiciones protectoras de los débiles
Unidad Familiar
  • Conservación
Discapacitado Mental
  • Protección efectiva
Intervencion Ciudadana
  • Solicitud inconstitucionalidad de norma no acusada por el actor
Persona En Circunstancias De Debilidad Manifiesta
  • Protección no vulnera principio de buena fe
Unidad Normativa
  • Carácter excepcional
  • Improcedencia
10 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 552Ley 84/73 «inciso 2»UPHELD
Art. 13Ley 57/87UPHELD
Art. 83Ley 57/87UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  2. segundo. del articulo 552 del Codigo Civil con relacion con los cargos formulados por desconocer los articulos 13 y 83 de la Constitucion Politica, en el entendido de que lo dicho en la disposicion respecto del conyuge comprende al companero permanente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.