JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 1, 1994Full bench

C-544 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Michell Pineda Ramirez Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
C.C. Arts 768964 Y1025 Parciales. Principio De La Buena Fe. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

9 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 84/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1025Ley 84/73 «Numeral 5 - "presumiéndose dolo por el mero hecho de la detención u ocultación"»UPHELD
Art. 768Ley 84/73UPHELD
Art. 964Ley 84/73 «en cuanto a los percibidos después, estará sujeto a las reglas de lso dos incisos anteriores»UPHELD
Art. 768Ley 57/87 «Pero el error en materia de derecho, constituye una presunción de mala fe, que no admite prueba en contrario»UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES las siguientes disposiciones del Código Civil:
  2. 1a. El inciso final del artículo 768, que dice: "Pero el error en materia de derecho, constituye una presunción de mala fe, que no admite prueba en contrario";
  3. 2a. Del inciso
  4. tercero. del artículo 964, la parte que dice: "...en cuanto a los percibidos después, estará sujeto a las reglas de los dos incisos anteriores";
  5. 3a. Del ordinal 5o., del artículo 1025, la frase final que dice: "...presumiéndose dolo por el mero hecho de la detención u ocultación".
  6. Notifíquese publíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.