C-110 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Nestor Raul Correa Henao
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Carencia actual de objeto
- Pensiones reconocidas antes de la ley 100 de 1993
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 4 de 1976 articulo 1 (parcial).
Se dictan normas sobre materia pensional de los sectores publico oficial semioficial y privado y se dictan otras disposiciones.
Ajuste anual de pensiones.
Sostiene el actor que la disposicion parcialmente acusada desconoce el articulo 13 de la constitucion.
Las vigencia de la norma acusada constituye un requisito de procedibilidad del juicio de inconstitucionalidad.
Cuando se demanda una norma derogada antes de proceder a declararse inhibida por carencia actual de objeto la corte esta en las obligacion de establecer si la misma continua produciendo efectos juridicos.
Fallo inhibitorio por carencia actual de objeto.
La norma acusada no se encuentra vigente dentro del ordenamiento juridico ni esta produciendo efecto alguno.
Inhibida
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 4/76. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- Declararse INHIBIDA para decidir sobre la demanda instaurada contra el articulo 1deg (parcial) de la Ley 4a de 1976 "por la cual se dictan normas sobre materia pensional de los sectores publico, oficial, semioficial y privado y se dictan otras disposiciones"
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.