JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 15, 1994Full bench

C-409 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Juan Horacio Lara Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 100/93. Art. 142. Der. A La Igualdad. Mesada Adicional Para Pensionados. Inexequible Una Expresion.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 142Ley 100/93STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«actuales»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (9 points)
  1. administrando justicia,
  2. EN NOMBRE DEL PUEBLO
  3. Y
  4. POR MANDATO DE LA CONSTITUCION,
  5. R E S U E L V E :
  6. Declarar la INEXEQUIBILIDAD de las expresiones "actuales" y "cuyas pensiones se hubiesen causado y reconocido antes del
  7. primero. (1o.) de enero de 1988", contenidas en el inciso
  8. primero. del articulo 142 de la Ley 100 de 1993, al igual que el inciso
  9. segundo. de la misma disposicion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.