JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 11, 2003Full bench

C-066 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Nestor Raul Correa Henao

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 179 De 1994. Arts. 3 (P.) Y 67. Ley 225 De 1995. Art. 1 (P.). Ley Organica De Presupuesto. Contribuciones Parafiscales. Ingresos De Establecimientos Publicos. Fondos Especiales. Acto Legislativo 01 De 2001. Participacion De Entidades Territoriales En
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Efectos jurídicos de la norma
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
Presupuesto General De La Nacion
  • Concepto político
  • Concepto
Acto Legislativo De Sistema General De Participaciones
  • Sistema de participación de entidades territoriales
Sistema General De Participaciones
  • Cuantía determinada por una base inicial fijada por la propia Constitución
Personas En Situación De Discapacidad
  • Control de Constitucionalidad de expresiones normativas que vulneran la dignidad humana o igualdad
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 179/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 3Ley 179/94DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 67Ley 179/94DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 1Ley 225/95UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES, por los cargos analizados en esta providencia, los apartes demandados del articulo 1o de la Ley 225 de 1995.
  4. Segundo. Inhibirse para pronunciarse de fondo sobre los articulos 3o y 67 de la Ley 179 de 1994.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.