JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 7, 1994Full bench

C-308 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Milciades Zuluaga Herrera

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2420/68. Dec. 1748/91. Dec. 2055/91. Dec. 663/93. Naturaleza Juridica Del Banco Cafetero. Rec. Parafiscales. Exequibles Unos Y Sent. Inhibitoria .
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

15 topics · 14 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2420/68. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 19Decreto 2420/68 «literal b, ordinal 2»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 1Decreto 2055/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2.4.9.1.1Decreto 1748/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 2Decreto 663/93UPHELD
Art. 264Decreto 663/93 «numeral 1, 3»UPHELD
Art. 265Decreto 663/93 «numeral 2»UPHELD
Art. 266Decreto 663/93 «numeral 1, 2»UPHELD
Art. 3Decreto 663/93UPHELD
8 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. PRIMERO. Declararse inhibida para resolver sobre la constitucionalidad de las siguientes disposiciones: literal b, ordinal 2 del articulo 19 del Decreto-Ley 2420 de 1968, Articulo 1 del Decreto-Ley 1748 de 1991 y Articulo 1 Decreto-Ley 2055 de 1991.
  4. SEGUNDO. Declaranse exequibles los articulos 264 numerales 1 Y 3, 265 numeral 2 y 266 numerales 1 Y 2 del Decreto-Ley 663 de 1993, con la advertencia de que el aporte o participacion del Fondo Nacional del Cafe en el Banco Cafetero, asi como sus rendimientos, o el eventual producto de su enajenacion como recursos parafiscales se encuentran afectados a la finalidad de dicho fondo, relativa a la proteccion, defensa y fomento de la industria cafetera.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.