JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 29, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Alvaro Jesus Urbano Rojas

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-443/00.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Via De Hecho
  • Elementos para la configuración
  • Alcance
  • Carácter excepcional
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud formulada por el accionante para que se declare la nulidad de la Sentencia T-443/00, para la Sala Plena el tratamiento dado al citado fallo se ajustó a los lineamientos señalados por la Corte, con base en ellos se revocó aplicando las orientaciones indicadas por la Corte en relación con la configuración de la vía de hecho, no encontrando motivo o razón de nulidad tampoco por esta razón ni por la modificación en el cambio de jurisprudencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. R E S U E LV E:
  3. DENEGAR la solicitud formulada por el doctor Alvaro Jesus Urbano Rojas, para que se declare la nulidad de la Sentencia T-443 del 14 de abril del ano 2000, proferida por la Sala Novena de Revision de esta Corporacion.
  4. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.