JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 7, 2004

T-952 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Edinson Perez Bermúdez Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion De Afiliado A Quien La Entidad No Le Ha Resuelto Después De Trece Meses Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Pension. Solicita Se Ordene Dar Respuesta A Su Solicitud. Contenido Del Derecho De Peticion. Terminos Para Resolver Solicitudes Re
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad de Barranquilla el 30 de diciembre de 2003. En consecuencia, CONCEDER la acción de tutela para proteger el derecho fundamental de petición del señor Édinson Pérez Bermúdez.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR al Instituto de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Atlántico, que si aun no lo hecho, dentro de los cinco (5) días hábiles siguientes a la notificación de esta providencia profiera el acto administrativo correspondiente que resuelva de fondo lo solicitado por el señor Édinson Pérez Bermúdez.
  4. TERCERO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.