JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 11, 2002

T-867 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Pedro Manuel Hernandez Villadiego Vs. Iss Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion De Vigilante. Solicitud Reconocimiento Pension De Vejez. Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Tutela Contra Particulares. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Organizaciones Privadas
  • Alcance
  • Dignidad del trabajador hace exigible respuesta de particulares
  • Protección por reclamo de pensión legal
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 6 de mayo de 2002, por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Cartagena. En su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela por violación del derecho fundamental de petición.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la empresa Vigilantes Marítima Comercial Ltda., y al Instituto de Seguros Sociales, que en el plazo máximo de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de la presente sentencia, den efectiva respuesta a las peticiones ante ellas elevadas por el accionante.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.