JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 5, 2000

T-836 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Mercedes Durango Jimenez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Sobre Procedencia De Recurso De Reposicion Relacionado Con Solicitud De Pension De Sobrevivientes. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 35 Penal Municipal de Medellín, el 28 de diciembre de 1999, dentro de la presente acción de tutela.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER el amparo del derecho de petición de la señora Mercedes Durango Jiménez y, en consecuencia ORDENAR al Jefe del Departamento de Atención al Pensionado de la Seccional Antioquia del Seguro Social, que, si todavía no lo ha hecho, resuelva, a más tardar dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, el recurso de reposición interpuesto por la accionante desde el 29 de abril de 1997 contra la Resolución 001681 de 1997
  3. Tercero. LÍBRESE por Secretaría la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.