JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 31, 2004

T-550 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Martha Diana Garzon Torres Vs. Coopseres

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reintegro Al Mismo Cargo O Equivalente Y Suministro De Informacion Laboral. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Licencia De Maternidad. Terminacion Unilateral Contrato De Trabajo Asociado. Estabilidad Laboral De Mujer Embarazada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Organizaciones Privadas
  • Suministro de información laboral
Licencia De Maternidad
  • Controversia sobre el pago no puede resolverse en la tutela interpuesta
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia de primera instancia que concedió el amparo transitorio a la señora MARTHA DIANA GARZÓN TORRES y ordenó su reintegro a un lugar de trabajo que la Cooperativa Coopseres asigne, sea el mismo de antes o uno similar, sin desmejorar sus condiciones.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR las sentencias de instancia en cuanto ampararon el derecho de petición de la accionante.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.