JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 29, 1994

T-536 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant German Sarmiento Palacio (Fundepublico)

✓
Topic · hard data
Accion Civil Popular Para El Resarcimiento De Daños Y Perjuicios Colectivos Causados Por El Hecho Punible. Apagon. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Revocar la sentencia de fecha 6 de julio de 1994, proferida por la Sala De Casación Penal de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia, que a su vez confirmó la sentencia del Tribunal Superior -Sala Penal- del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, de mayo 24 del año en curso, mediante las cuales se negó la tutela solicitada por el doctor Germán Sarmiento Palacio.
  2. SEGUNDO. Conceder a la peticionaria la tutela de los derechos fundamentales al debido proceso y al derecho de acceso a la justicia. Por lo tanto, la Fiscalía Delegada No. 257 deberá, a efectos de garantizar la tutela de dichos derechos, proceder a admitir la demanda de constitución de parte civil y a darle el trámite que según la ley procesal penal corresponde.
  3. TERCERO. Líbrense por intermedio de la Secretaría de la Corte las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí previstos.
  4. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.