JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 27, 2002

T-499 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Maria Idalid Mendieta Niampira Vs. Iss Boyaca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud E Igualdad De Persona Con Sindrome De Dawn. Solicitud Transplante De Cadera. Sistema De Turnos Y Su Alteracion. Prima Facie. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Sistema de turnos y su alteración
  • Sistema de turnos para racionalización del servicio
Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Test de igualdad
  • Tratamiento preferencial a personas en circunstancias de debilidad manifiesta
  • Condiciones de debilidad mental o física que no inciden en sus necesidades
  • Protección de personas en circunstancias de debilidad manifiesta
Juicio De Igualdad
  • Criterios de distribución de beneficios o cargas
  • Paciente con síndrome de dawn no se encuentra en desigualdad en el sistema de turnos para atención en salud
4 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas, la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Chiquinquirá, del 22 de agosto de 2001, que denegó las pretensiones de la demanda.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.