JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 2, 2000

T-471 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Veronica Maria Ramirez Rodriguez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Seguridad Social. Cirugia De Senos Que No Realiza Coomeva. No Se Trata De Cirugia Estetica. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empresa De Medicina Prepagada
  • Exclusiones
  • Práctica de cirugía excluida que no tiene fines estéticos
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, por medio del cual se negó la protección solicitada. En su lugar, se concede la tutela de los derechos a una vida digna, a la integridad personal, a la salud y a la seguridad social de la actora. En consecuencia, se ORDENA a Salud Coomeva Medicina Prepagada S.A. Regional- Medellín, que, en el término de las siguientes cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de este Fallo, si así lo estima el médico tratante, o en la oportunidad que, bajo su responsabilidad profesional él indique, practique la cirugía que requiere VERONICA MARÍA RAMÍREZ RODRÍGUEZ.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.