JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 2, 2000

T-469 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jose Elias Guerra De La Espriella

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Derecho De Defensa. Presuncion De Inocencia. Via De Hecho. Enriquecimiento Ilicito De Exsenador. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Improcedencia por existir otro medio de defensa judicial
Recurso De Casacion Penal
  • Idoneidad para la protección de derechos fundamentales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Confirmar las sentencias proferidas por las Salas Jurisdiccionales Disciplinarias del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca y del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura, los dias 6 de octubre de 1999 y 4 de noviembre del mismo ano, respectivamente, en cuanto declararon la improcedencia de la accion de tutela instaurada por el ex-Senador de la Republica, el doctor Jose Elias Guerra de la Espriella, en contra de los extintos Juzgado Regional de Santafe de Bogota y el Tribunal Nacional.
  4. Segundo. Por la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Comuniquese, notifiquese, publiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.