JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 7, 2004

T-441 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Gomez Lizarazo Vs. Semanario Portada Barrancabermeja

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Honra Y Buen Nombre Del Defensor Del Pueblo Regional Magdalena Medio. Solicitud Rectificacion De Informacion. Traslado Testigo De Homicidio Contra Periodista Sindicado A Las Autodefensas. Limites A La Libertad De Expresion. Estado De Indefens
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Informacion
  • No fue veraz, ni imparcial, ni responsable por lo que se vulneraron derechos fundamentales
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 26 de septiembre de 2003 por el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Barrancabermeja.
  2. Segundo. Proteger los derechos fundamentales a la honra y al buen nombre de Jorge Enrique Gómez Lizarazo.
  3. Tercero. Ordenar al director del semanario Portada de Barrancabermeja que, si es que aún no lo ha hecho, en el término de 48 horas rectifique, de manera clara y suficiente, la información reportada en las ediciones 105, 106 y 107 de 2003 y relacionada con el Defensor Regional Jorge Enrique Lizarazo.
  4. Cuarto. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.