JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 22, 2003

T-411 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Luis Carlos Feo Encizo Vs. Hospital Simon Bolivar Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Seguridad Social E Igualdad De Persona Con Vih. Exoneracion Cuotas Moderadoras De Recuperacion O Copagos. Enfermedad Catastrofica O Ruinosa. Trato Discriminatorio. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Enfermo De Sida
  • Copagos y cuotas moderadoras
Regimen De Seguridad Social En Salud
  • Persona vinculada a la que se le dio trato discriminatorio al exigirle pago de cuota de recuperación
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la sentencia proferida el 13 de noviembre de 2002 por el Juzgado 58 Penal Municipal de Bogotá y la sentencia proferida el 16 de enero de 2003 por el Juzgado 9 Penal de Circuito de Bogotá.
  2. Segundo. Tutelar los derechos a la vida, a la seguridad social en salud y a la igualdad del actor Luis Carlos Feo Encizo.
  3. Tercero. Ordenarle al Hospital Simón Bolívar de Bogotá abstenerse de cobrarle al actor suma alguna por concepto de cuotas de recuperación con ocasión del tratamiento a que fue sometido en razón de la enfermedad catastrófica que padece. En su lugar se dispone que esas sumas sean asumidas por el Fondo Distrital de Salud.
  4. Cuarto. DÉSE cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.