JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 17, 1996

T-315 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Gilberto Salazar Ramirez

✓
Topic · hard data
Reajuste De La Mesada Pensional De Congresista. Reintegro De Sumas. Fondo De Prevision Social Del Congreso. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pension De Jubilacion
  • Revocatoria reajuste fondo del Congreso
Revocacion Directa De Acto Administrativo Particular Y Concreto
  • Consentimiento expreso y escrito del titular
  • Procedencia de tutela
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCASE la sentencia proferida por la Seccion Segunda de lo contencioso administrativo del Consejo de Estado, del nueve (9) de febrero de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996). En su lugar, CONFIRMASE PARCIALMENTE la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia, en lo que no pugne con el ordinal
  2. segundo. de la parte resolutiva de este fallo.
  3. Segundo. ORDENASE al Fondo de Prevision Social del Congreso de la Republica abstenerse de iniciar en contra del doctor Gilberto Salazar Ramirez, cualquier accion ejecutiva para obtener el reintegro de las sumas que, por concepto de mesada pensional, se dice han sido pagadas de mas. Ordenasele, ademas, continuar con el pago de la pension, con el ajuste reconocido en enero de 1994, mientras la jurisdiccion de lo contencioso administrativo no decida lo contrario, si se presenta la demanda de que trata la parte motiva de este fallo.
  4. En consecuencia, REVOCANSE las ordenes contenidas en el fallo del Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia.
  5. Tercero. COMUNICAR esta providencia a la Seccion Segunda del Tribunal Administrativo de Antioquia, para los efectos contemplados en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.