JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 14, 2002

T-188 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jose Ricardo Ochoa Duran Y Otros Vs. Juzgado Octavo Civil Municipal Neiva

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Exceso De Poder. Incidente De Desacato. Naturaleza. Finalidad. Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales. Fahuila S.A. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Naturaleza jurídica
  • Finalidad
Accion De Tutela Contra Juez Por Via De Hecho
  • Al tramitarse el desacato no dio cumplimiento al fallo de instancia
Via De Hecho
  • Características
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal, el 20 de noviembre de 2001, dentro de la acción de tutela interpuesta por los ciudadanos José Ricardo Ochoa Durán, Jorge Eliécer Vargas Valenzuela y Luis Alfonso Robles, en cuanto dejó sin efecto la providencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Neiva, Sala Penal, en esta acción de tutela.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia dictada por el Tribunal Superior de Neiva, Sala Penal, pero por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  3. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.