JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 26, 2004

T-167 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Luis Roberto Martinez Figueredo Vs El Sena

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos De La Persona De Tercera Edad A La Vida Seguridad Social Dignidad Humana. Procedibilidad De La Accion De Tutela Para Reclamar Prestaciones Pensionales. Compartibilidad Pensional. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Casos en que no procede para reconocimiento y pago de pensiones
  • Improcedencia para resolver controversias sobre subrogación o compartibilidad pensional
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Del Adulto Mayor
  • Procedencia de tutela para reconocimiento y pago de pensiones
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Levantar la suspension de terminos ordenada por auto del 16 de junio de 2003 en el proceso de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas en primera instancia, por el Juzgado
  3. Cuarto. Penal del Circuito Judicial de Santa Marta y en segunda instancia por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Marta, en el sentido de DENEGAR la tutela en el proceso de la referencia.
  4. TERCERO. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.