C-584 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Jose Manuel Alvarez Zarate
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Gravamen causado y no pagado
- Recaudo no requiere vigencia de ley
- Situación jurídica consolidada
- Derogación de norma
- Derogación de norma
- Producción de efectos jurídicos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 69 de 1946.
Art.12.
Ley 33 de 1969.
Art. 30.
Lit.c.(p).
Decreto 1333 de 1986.
Art.227.
Inc.1 y 228.tarifas de algunos impuestos indirectos.
Fortalecimiento de los fiscos seccionales y municipales.
Impuestos sobre rifas y apuestas.
Codigo del regimen municipal
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 69/46. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- RESUELVE:
- Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse de fondo en relación con la constitucionalidad de los artículos 12 de la Ley 69 de 1946; 3º literal c) (parcial) de la Ley 33 de 1969, 227 y 228 inciso 1º del Decreto 1333 de 1986 por carencia actual de objeto.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.