JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 24, 1993Full bench

C-542 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Alberto Zuleta

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 40/93. Arts 12 16 18 19 20 21 24 25 Y 26. Ley Antisecuestro. Inexequibles Salvo Arts 12 16 25 Y 25. Art 26 Exequible Salvo Expresion Final.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 40/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 12Ley 40/93UPHELD
Art. 18Ley 40/93STRUCK DOWN
Art. 19Ley 40/93STRUCK DOWN
Art. 20Ley 40/93STRUCK DOWN
Art. 21Ley 40/93STRUCK DOWN
Art. 24Ley 40/93STRUCK DOWN
Art. 25Ley 40/93UPHELD
Art. 26Ley 40/93UPHELD
9 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES los artículos 12, 16 y 25 de la ley 40 de 1993, salvo cuando el agente actúe en alguna de las circunstancias de justificación del hecho previstas en la ley penal, caso en el cual son INEXEQUIBLES.
  2. SEGUNDO. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 26 de la misma ley, salvo la expresión final que dice: "...sin perjuicio de lo establecido en el artículo 12 de la presente ley", la cual se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
  3. TERCERO. Decláranse INEXEQUIBLES los artículos 18, 19, 20, 21 y 24 de la ley 40 de 1993.
  4. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceFabio Morón DíazPartial dissentVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.