C-535 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Maria Angela Torres Perez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Es objetivo y no formal
- Improcedencia
- Porte de estupefacientes en centros educacionales
- Agravación de la pena por realización de conducta en institución educativa
- No configuración
- Agravación de la pena no viola derecho a la igualdad
- Imposibilidad de establecer vulneración cuando se comparan tipos penales que protegen bienes jurídicos distintos y contienen elementos jurídicos diferentes
- Condiciones para ser considerado constitucionalmente legítimo
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 599 de 2000 articulo 384 numeral 1º literal b (parcial).
Se expide el codigo penal.
Circunstancias de agravacion punitiva.
Para la actora la expresion acusada vulnera el articulo 13 de la constitucion politica.
Ausencia de cosa juzgada.
Condiciones para que un trato diferenciado se pueda considerar constitucionalmente legitimo.
Considera la corte que la agravacion de la pena por el porte de estupefacientes en centros educacionales no viola el derecho a la igualdad antes por el contrario resulta razonable y proporcionado.
Exequible
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE:
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE, por los cargos examinados, la expresion "centros educacionales" contenida en el literal b), del numeral 1, del articulo 384 de la Ley 599 de 2000.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.