C-281 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Tatiana Lucia Sanchez Prieto
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Constatación en la norma acusada frente a la Constitución y no frente a la voluntad del legislador
- Examen oficioso de facultades extraordinarias
- No contempla materia relativa a judicatura en entidades vigiladas por algunas Superintendencias
- No cabe interpretar regulación de requisitos para optar por un título profesional
- Razones por las cuales textos acusados se estiman violados
- No autorización de regulación de requisitos de acreditación de judicatura para acceder a título de abogado
- Ausencia de cargo de inconstitucionalidad
- Determinación de cargo de inconstitucionalidad a analizar
- Tema regulado no se enmarca en objetivo
- Interpretación restrictiva y ejercicio en estrictos y precisos términos
- Vigencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Decreto 2150 de 1995.
Art. 93 (p.).
Se suprimen y reforman regulaciones procedimientos o tramites innecesarios existentes en la administracion publica.
Facultades extraordinarias.
Ministerio de justicia y del derecho.
Requisitos para acreditar la judicatucatura
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 3200/79. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- R E S U E L V E:
- Declarar INEXEQUIBLE, el articulo 93 del Decreto Ley 2150 de 1995.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.