C-210 de 1997
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Carmenza Isaza de Goméz
✓Claimant Martha Patricia Ayala Romero
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Derogación de disposiciones anteriores
- Prioridad para el ingreso y estudio gratuito de hijos
- Exclusión pago de derechos académicos
- Cobro derechos académicos a quien pueda sufragarlos
- Gratuidad por carencia de capacidad de pago
- Aplicación y sujeción a leyes
- Prohibición de establecer distinción que la ley no hace
- Estímulo económico a servidores del sector educativo
- Responsabilidad
- Desarrollo de la Constitución
- Gratuidad
- Diferencias de trato carente de fundamento objetivo y razonable
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 115/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. INHÍBESE de pronunciarse sobre el artículo 125 de la ley 115 de 1994, por encontrarse derogada.
- Segundo. Declárase INEXEQUIBLE el artículo 186 de la ley 115 de 1994, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.