JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 24, 1999Full bench

C-188 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Ana Maria Acosta Y Otras

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 446/98. Art. 72 Parcial. Conclusion Del Proceso Conciliatorio. Intereses Comerciales Y Moratorios. Art 177 C.C.A. Exequible E Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Interes Moratorio
  • Momento a partir del cual se causan
2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 01/84. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 177Decreto 01/84STRUCK DOWN
Art. 65Ley 23/91UPHELD
On the entire provisionDecreto 2651/91STRUCK DOWN
Art. 72Ley 446/98 «el segundo inciso del artículo 65 de la ley 23 de 1991, tal como ...»UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Declárase EXEQUIBLE, en los términos de esta sentencia, el
  2. segundo. inciso del artículo 65 de la Ley 23 de 1991, tal como quedó redactado a partir de la vigencia del artículo 72 de la Ley 446 de 1998, salvo las expresiones "durante los seis (6) meses siguientes al plazo acordado para su pago" y "después de este último", las cuales se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
  3. Por unidad normativa, declárase EXEQUIBLE, en los términos de esta sentencia, el inciso último del artículo 177 del Código Contencioso Administrativo (Decreto Ley 01 de 1984), excepto las expresiones "durante los seis (6) meses siguientes a su ejecutoria" y "después de este término", que se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
  4. La presente Sentencia surte efectos a partir del día siguiente a su notificación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.