JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 22, 1998Full bench

C-146 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant German Villalba Sandoval

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 100/93. Arts. 36 Y 133. Ley 33/85. Art. 1. Ley 4/66. Arts. 4 Y 5. Ley 6/45. Art. 17 Lit. B). Edad Minima Para Pensiones. Regimen De Transicion. Sent. Inhibitoria. Ver <a Href=../1995/C-168-95.Rtf> C-168/95</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Carece de competencia para exigir expedición de normas en determinado sentido
Omision Legislativa
  • Alcance de la competencia
Omisión Legislativa Relativa
  • Examen no debe hacerse a partir del texto de una norma específica
Reajuste De Pensiones
  • Improcedencia de aplicación retroactiva de cláusula de actualización monetaria
7 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 6/45. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 17Ley 6/45DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 4Ley 4/66DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 5Ley 4/66DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 1Ley 33/85DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 133Ley 100/93DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 36Ley 100/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
6 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Salvo en lo resuelto en el numeral
  2. segundo. de esta parte resolutiva, declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse de fondo sobre la constitucionalidad de los articulos 36 y 133 de la Ley 100 de 1993, 1deg de la Ley 33 de 1985, 4deg y 5deg de la Ley 4a de 1966, y 17 literal b) de la Ley 6a de 1945, por falta de cargos substanciales en contra del contenido normativo de los preceptos acusados.
  3. Segundo. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-168 de 1995 que declaro inexequible el inciso
  4. tercero. del articulo 36 de la Ley 100 de 1993, unicamente el aparte final del mismo, que dice : " Sin embargo, cuando el tiempo que les hiciere falta fuere igual o inferior a dos (2) anos a la entrada en vigencia de la presente ley, el ingreso base para liquidar la pension sera el promedio de lo devengado en los dos (2) ultimos anos, para los trabajadores del sector privado y de un (1) ano para los servidores publicos".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.