C-131 de 2004
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Manuel Alberto Restrepo Medina
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Alcance
- No es absoluto
- Ponderación con otros principios en su aplicación para un caso concreto
- Alcance
- Tiene fundamento en el principio de buena fe
- Concepto
- Irradia a la actividad judicial
- No se opone a modificación de leyes
- Presupuestos
- Revisión técnico mecánica bianual
- Revisión técnico mecánica bianual no desconoce la buena fe
- Revisión técnico mecánica bianual no desconoce la confianza legítima
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 769 de 2002.
Art. 51 (p.).
Codigo nacional de transito terrestre.
Revision anual tecnico-mecanica vehiculos de servicio publico.
Particulares cada dos años.
Buena fe.
Confianza legitima.
Exequible.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 769/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (20 points)
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion "y los de servicio diferente al servicio publico cada dos anos" del articulo 51 de la Ley 769 de 2002, por los cargos analizados en la sentencia.
- CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
- Presidenta
- JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
- Magistrado
- ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
- Magistrado
- MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
- Magistrado
- JAIME CORDOBA TRIVINO
- Magistrado
- RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
- Magistrado
- MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
- Magistrado
- EDUARDO MONTEALEGRE LYNETT
- Magistrado
- ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
- Magistrado
- IVAN HUMBERTO ESCRUCERIA MAYOLO
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.