C-1288 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Edgar Manuel Caicedo Barrera
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Advertencia del juez al fiscal de variación no constituye prejuzgamiento
- Cuestionamientos constitucionales suscitados por facultad del juez de señalar al fiscal el cambio
- Necesidad de variar la advertida por juez y dada a conocer al fiscal en audiencia pública
- Advertencia del juez al fiscal de variación no afecta imparcialidad
- Oportunidad de defensa del sindicado
- Variación dada a conocer por el juez al fiscal compromete imparcialidad del juez
- Distinción entre posición del acusado y sindicado
- Variación de acusación
- Garantía
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 600 de 2000.
Art. 404 num. 2 inc. 1.
Codigo de procedimiento penal.
Variacion de la calificacion juridica provisional de la conducta punible.
Derecho de defensa del sindicado.
Exequible.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (23 points)
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- R E S U E L V E:
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE, por los cargos formulados, el inciso
- primero. del numeral 2º del artículo 404 de la Ley 600 de 2000.
- ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
- Presidente
- JAIME ARAUJO RENTERIA
- Magistrado
- MANUEL JOSE CEPEDA ESPINOSA
- Magistrado
- JAIME CORDOBA TRIVIÑO
- Magistrado
- RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
- Magistrado
- MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
- Magistrado
- RODRIGO UPRIMNY YEPES
- Magistrado (E)
- ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
- Magistrado
- CLARA INES VARGAS HERNANDEZ
- Magistrado
- MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA MENDEZ
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.