JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 8, 1996Full bench

C-045 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1902/95. Por El Cual Se Toman Medidas En Materia De Informacion. Conmocion Interior. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Legislativo
  • Nuevo motivo de perturbación
  • Conexidad
Derechos Fundamentales
  • No son absolutos
  • Universalidad
  • Inviolables
Medios De Comunicación
  • Prohibición de difundir comunicados guerrilleros
  • Prohibición de difusión de comunicados
Paz
  • Comunicados
Conmocion Interior
  • Inconstitucionalidad de decretos expedidos
Derechos Humanos
  • Difusión de comunicados sobre violación
Guerrilla
  • Difusión de comunicados
16 topics · 14 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1902/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 1902/95UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el Decreto 1902 del 2 de noviembre de 1995. En relacion con el articulo 1o. se aclara que los comunicados y declaraciones a que el se refiere deben ser los previstos en el considerando
  4. segundo. del decreto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.