JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 2, 1995Full bench

C-027 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Luis Alonso Velasco Parrado

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 100/93. Art. 11 Parcial. Cosa Juzgada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el art. 11 (parcial), inciso final de la Ley 100 de 1993, “por el cual se crea el Sistema de Seguridad Social Integral y se dictan otras disposiciones”.

El actor afirmó que se incurrió en un exceso legislativo por imponer el arbitramento como mecanismo de solución de conflictos colectivos de trabajo.

La Corte evidenció que el articulado demandando fue objeto de pronunciamiento previo por parte de la Corporación, por tanto, se configuró la cosa juzgada constitucional.

Por lo anterior, declaró estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia C-408/94.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 11Ley 100/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la Sentencia Ndeg C-408 de septiembre 15 de 1994.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.