JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 28, 2003Full bench

C-033 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Mercedes Perez Roldan

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 600 De 2000. Art. 126. Codigo De Procedimiento Penal. Calidad De Sujeto Procesal. Condicion Del Imputado Como Interviniente. Distincion. Vinculacion Mediante Indagatoria O Declaratoria De Persona Ausente. Investigacion Previa. Derecho De Defensa. Exeq
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Defensa En Investigacion Previa
  • Limitación es objeto de control estricto
  • Persona individualizada
  • Dimensión amplia
Derecho De Defensa En Proceso Penal
  • Limitación es objeto de control estricto
Imputado Y Sindicado
  • Distinción constitucionalmente válida
Investigacion Previa
  • Características e importancia
Proceso
  • Partícipes
9 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion "y sera sujeto procesal" contenida en el articulo 126 de la Ley 600 de 2000, en el entendido en que, aun antes de la vinculacion mediante indagatoria o como persona ausente, el imputado tendra los mismos derechos del sujeto procesal, en lo que se refiere al ejercicio del derecho de defensa y la proteccion de sus derechos constitucionales.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.