JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 21, 2003Full bench

C-005 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 715 De 2001. Art. 106. Distribucion Recursos Y Competencias Entre La Nacion Y Entidades Territoriales. Prestacion Servicios De Educacion Y Salud. Recursos Complementarios Al Sistema General De Participaciones. Juegos De Suerte Y Azar. Porcentaje Que D
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Proyecto De Ley
  • Trámite
  • Modificación por el Congreso del presentado por el Gobierno
Iniciativa Gubernamental En Proyecto De Ley
  • No modificación per se por el Congreso de materias distintas también de iniciativa del Gobierno
  • No modificación per se por el Congreso sin coadyuvancia
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 715/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 106Ley 715/01STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 1/01STRUCK DOWN
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar la INEXEQUIBILIDAD del articulo 106 de la Ley 715 de 2001.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceManuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.