JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 30, 2011

T-895 de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Luisa Fernanda Vargas Perez·Respondent Inpec

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Temeraria
  • Inexistencia por cuanto no se presenta identidad de hechos ni de derechos
Carencia Actual De Objeto Por Hecho Superado
  • Traslado de interna a Bogotá, por solicitud de hija adolescente
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Unidad familiar.

La menor demandante interpuso la acción de tutela en contra del INPEC, con el fin de que se le amparen sus derechos fundamentales y se le de respuesta a la solicitud que elevó, para que a su progenitora, quien paga una pena privativa de la libertad de más de catorce años, se le conceda el traslado del Centro Penitenciario ERON del municipio de Jamundí (Valle) a la cárcel El Buen Pastor de Bogotá, ciudad en la que ella reside actualmente.

En sede de revisión el instituto demandado allegó la constancia mediante la cual ordenó el traslado pretendido y en tal sentido, la Sala declara la CARENCIA ACTUAL DE OBJETO POR HECHO SUPERADO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto por hecho superado en la presente accion de tutela.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifiquese, comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.