JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 17, 2000

T-889 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Consuelo Maria Perez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad E Igualdad Y Educacion Del Menor. Debido Proceso. Corte De Pelo. Inem. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad
  • Corte de cabello
  • Juicio de proporcionalidad sobre restricciones a la apariencia personal de educandos
  • Límites
Reglamento Educativo
  • Proporcionalidad en imponer sanciones por razones de cabello largo
Educacion
  • Obligación de la sociedad
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (11 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellin del catorce de febrero de dos mil y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela del derecho fundamental al libre desarrollo de la personalidad e igualdad del menor Camilo Sandoval Marin.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a las directivas del INEM "Jose Felix de Restrepo" que adopten todas las medidas necesarias para proceder a la reforma de la clausula reglamentaria relacionada con el corte de pelo de los menores, cuya inconstitucionalidad esta demostrada de conformidad con lo dicho en la presente sentencia.
  4. Tercero. Para los efectos del articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juez de origen hara las notificaciones y tomara las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
  5. ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
  6. Magistrado
  7. FABIO MORON DIAZ
  8. Magistrado
  9. VLADIMIRO NARANJO MESA
  10. Magistrado
  11. MARTHA V. SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.