JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 1, 2004

T-837 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Alvaro Casas Vs. Famisanar

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud De Afiliado Por La Negativa De La Entidad A Practicarle Intevencion Quirurgica Programada Que Requiere Con Urgencia Como Consecuencia De La Desafiliacion Por Terminación De La Relacion Laboral. Solicita Se Ordene La Practica De La Cirug
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Exigencia de periodo mínimo de cotización
  • Práctica de cirugía
Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Tiempo de cubrimiento de los servicios una vez finalizada la relación laboral y estando el tratamiento médico en curso
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Revocar la Sentencia proferida el treinta y uno de mayo de 2004 por el Juzgado Diecinueve Civil Municipal de Bogota.
  2. Segundo. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho a la salud del senor Alvaro Casas, ordenando a la E.P.S. FAMISANAR que, si aun no lo ha hecho, en el termino de las cuarenta y ocho horas siguientes a la notificacion de la presente providencia reanude la atencion medica que requiere el demandante, y a la mayor brevedad posible autorice que se lleve a cabo el procedimiento quirurgico denominado "prostatectomia transuretral" necesario para el tratamiento de la hiperplasia de la prostata que padece, atendiendolo hasta la culminacion del periodo post operatorio y cubriendo totalmente los costos correspondientes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.