T-798 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis
✓Claimant Fernando Diaz Vallejo Vs. Comcel S.A.·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia excepcional
- Hecho superado
- Inexistencia de perjuicio irremediable
- Improcedencia para obtener abono y rectificación de sumas por servicio de telefonía móvil celular
- Servicios no domiciliarios de comunicaciones
- Reclamación por conducta asumida por Comcel
- Naturaleza
- Régimen de competencia en servicios no domiciliarios de comunicaciones
- No es servicio público domiciliario
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- R E S U E L V E:
- Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el juzgado
- Segundo. Civil Municipal de Yumbo Valle, mediante sentencia del 16 de febrero del 2000, en el proceso de la referencia, con base en las consideraciones expresadas en la presente providencia.
- Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.