JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 11, 1998

T-794 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Mercedes Velasquez De Valderrama

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento Y Pago De Cesantias Parciales. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion En Cesantias Parciales
  • Pronta resolución y decisión de fondo
  • Reconocimiento no sujeto a disponibilidad presupuestal
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por los Juzgados Tercera Penal Municipal y
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Neiva, de 1deg de agosto y 15 de octubre de 1998, respectivamente.
  3. Segundo. TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de peticion, para lo cual se ordenara al Fondo de Prestaciones del Magisterio, Regional Huila, para que en el termino maximo de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, resuelva de fondo la peticion ante ella elevada el 15 de septiembre de 1996 por la senora Mercedes Velasquez de Valderrama, en relacion con su solicitud de reconocimiento y pago de sus cesantias parciales.
  4. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.