JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 11, 2004

T-764 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Celmira Cruz Rodríguez Vs. Secretaria De Salud Departamental Del Huila Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Salud Y Seguridad Social De Afiliada Al Sisben Por No Practica De Una Radiografia De Columna Formulada Por Medico Tratante. Solicita Se Le Autorice La Radiografia Y Cancele Cuota De Recuperación Que Adeuda Al Hospital Al Igual Que Su Car
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • No práctica de examen de columna por no pago de cuota de recuperación
  • No práctica de examen de columna por no tener carnet de SISBEN
Sisben
  • No tener el carnet no puede impedir acceder a servicios de salud
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del veintinueve (29) de marzo de 2004, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. de Menores de la ciudad de Neiva y, en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela de los derechos a la vida, a la salud y a la seguridad social dentro de la accion instaurada por la senora Celmira Cruz Rodriguez contra la Secretaria Departamental de Salud del Huila.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria Departamental de Salud del Huila, para que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de la presente sentencia, se le practique a la senora Celmira Cruz Rodriguez la radiografia de columna solicitada por su medico tratante y adopte los requisitos medicos.
  4. Tercero. LIBRESE por secretaria la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.