JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 15, 2004

T-674 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Francisca Hoyos Ruiz Vs. Comparta A.R.S.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Y Salud. Solicitud Implante De Stent Ordenada Por Medico Tratante En Paciente De Tercera Edad Beneficiaria Del Regimen Subsidiado Sisben. Tratamiento Por Fuera Del Poss. Agencia Oficiosa. Legitimación Por Activa. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Administradora Del Regimen Subsidiado
  • Orden de autorizar intervención quirúrgica de STENT
  • Atención de tratamiento médico excluido del POS-S
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal Municipal de Monteria, el 23 de febrero de 2004.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la accion de tutela impetrada por la senora Francisca Hoyos Ruiz en su calidad de agente oficiosa de su conyuge Alfonso Enrique Estrada Gonzalez.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR al representante legal de la A.R.S. Comparta de la ciudad de Monteria, o quien hagas sus veces, autorizar la intervencion quirurgica requerida por el senor Alfonso Enrique Estrada Gonzalez, asi como el tratamiento medico que necesite para su enfermedad, dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de esta sentencia.
  5. Librense por Secretaria, las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  6. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.