T-664 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Karlod Yolima Rivera Vargas Vs. Ingesa.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Manifestación escrita de no renovación
- Estabilidad
- No se demostró relación directa de causalidad entre el estado de embarazo y la no renovación del contrato
- Elementos fácticos que deben demostrarse para el reintegro
- Casos excepcionales de reintegro por despido de mujer embarazada
- Protección constitucional especial
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por los Juzgados
- Octavo. (8) Civil Municipal y
- Quinto. (5) Civil del Circuito de Neiva (Huila).
- Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.