JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 8, 2004

T-652 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Lizbeth Sarmiento Picalua Y Otro Vs. Saludcoop

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Vida E Integridad Personal De Afiliados Con Vih. Solicitud Practica Examenes De Carga Viral Excluidos Del Pos. Incapacidad Economica De Solicitantes. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Práctica de examen de carga viral
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia dictada por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil Municipal de Barranquilla, del 4 de diciembre de 2003, que nego la tutela de los derechos fundamentales de los ciudadanos Lizbeth Sarmiento Picalua y Jose Gallego Garcia y en su lugar CONCEDER la tutela de sus derechos fundamentales a la salud, a la vida y a la integridad personal.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR a la entidad demandada que, en el termino de 48 horas proceda a autorizar la practica del examen de carga viral ordenado a los actores. La realizacion del examen no podra efectuarse mas alla de un termino razonable conforme a los turnos de atencion de la respectiva E.P.S. y, en ningun caso, en un plazo superior a un mes. Debera, para tal efecto, informar a los jueces de instancia y a los demandantes, la fecha cierta de realizacion del examen.
  4. TERCERO. Para los efectos del articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el juzgado de origen hara las notificaciones y tomara las medidas conducentes para el cumplimiento de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.