JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 1995

T-607 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Maria Ismelda Ardila Cardona

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Educacion. No Pago De Pensiones. Entrega De Certificados. Negada Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Prestación de servicio público de educación
Derecho A La Educación
  • Expedición certificado de estudios
Establecimiento Educativo
  • Expedición certificado de estudios
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Cobro pensión de estudios
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia calendada 11 de agosto de 1995, proferida por el Juzgado
  3. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Medellín, con base en las consideraciones expuestas.
  4. Segundo. Adicionar la sentencia de fecha 11 de agosto de 1995, proferida por el juzgado
  5. Sexto. Civil Municipal de Medellín, en el sentido de ordenar al Colegio Panamericano Colombo Sueco, la expedición de los certificados escolares de la menor Gellen Xiomara Villa Ardila, solicitados por la señora María Ismelda Ardila Cardona en un término de 48 horas contadas a partir de la notificación del presente proveído.
  6. Tercero. Líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.