JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 11, 1999

T-586 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jorge Alberto Negret Van Arcken

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Subsidio Familiar De Los Hijastros. Der. A La Igualdad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Familia
  • Protección constitucional especial
Principio De Lealtad Procesal En Tutela
  • Falta a la verdad en los hechos
Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Prestación de servicio público
Derecho A La Igualdad De La Familia
  • Matrimonio y voluntad libre de conformarla
Derecho A La Igualdad En Subsidio Familiar
  • Hijastros que aporta el compañero
Derecho Al Subsidio Familiar
  • En principio no es fundamental
  • Fundamental por conexidad
10 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR, por las razones expuestas en la parte considerativa del presente fallo, la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil del Circuito de Ibague, el 1deg de marzo de 1999.
  3. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela para la proteccion de los derechos a la familia y a la igualdad de la menor Malka Negret Roldan. En consecuencia, ordenar a la Caja de Compensacion de Fenalco del Tolima "Comfenalco del Tolima", que a partir de la notificacion del presente fallo, reconozca y pague el subsidio familiar en dinero que le corresponde por su condicion de hijastra de la senora Claudia Osorio Gomez.
  4. Tercero. SURTASE el tramite previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.